exapp.htm

Page
I.	THE APPLICANTS	2

	A. New Mountain Finance Corporation and New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C.	2

	B. New Mountain Finance Advisers BDC, L.L.C.	3

II.	RELIEF FOR PROPOSED PAYMENT IN STOCK	6

	A. Proposed Payment of Stock to the Adviser	6

	B. Analysis	10

	C. Precedent	15

	D. Basis for Exemptive Relief	16

	E. Request for Relief	16

III.	PROCEDURAL MATTERS	17

	A. Communications	17

	B. Authorizations	18

	C. Verification	20

In the Matter of:

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE

HOLDINGS L.L.C.;

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE

CORPORATION; AND

NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE ADVISERS

BDC, L.L.C.

787 7th Avenue, 48th Floor

New York, NY 10019

(212) 720-0300

File No. 812-13940

Investment Company Act of 1940

)

AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO APPLICATION

FOR AN ORDER PURSUANT TO

SECTION 6(c) OF THE INVESTMENT

COMPANY ACT OF 1940 (“1940 ACT”)

GRANTING AN EXEMPTION FROM

SECTIONS 63 AND 23(a) OF THE 1940

ACT

New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. (the “Company”), New Mountain Finance Corporation (“NMF Corp”), and New Mountain Finance Advisers BDC, L.L.C., the Company’s investment adviser (the “Adviser”) (collectively, the “Applicants”), hereby request an order (the “Order”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) pursuant to Section 6(c) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”),1 granting an exemption from Sections 63 and 23(a) to the extent necessary to permit the payment in stock by the Company to the Adviser of a limited portion of the Adviser’s incentive fee pursuant to the terms and subject to the conditions of the Company’s investment advisory agreement with the Adviser.

NMF Corp, a Delaware corporation organized in June 2010, is a holding company with no direct operations of its own, and its only business and sole assets are its ownership of common membership units of the Company. The Company is an externally managed, closed-end, non-diversified business development company2 (“BDC”) managed by the Adviser and is the operating company for NMF Corp’s business. On May 19, 2011 each of NMF Corp and the Company filed Forms N-54A with the SEC, electing to be treated as business development companies under the 1940 Act. NMF Corp filed a registration statement on Form N-2 (the “Registration Statement”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “1933 Act”) in connection with its initial public offering of shares of common stock (the “IPO”). The Company, which was organized in Delaware in October 2008, is deemed the co-issuer of the shares of common stock offered in the IPO and has signed the Registration Statement. NMF Corp used the gross proceeds of the IPO to acquire common membership units in the Company.3 The number of common membership units issued to NMF Corp in exchange for the gross proceeds equaled the number of shares of common stock issued by NMF Corp in the IPO. At all times, one common membership unit in the Company is and will remain the economic equivalent of one share of NMF Corp common stock.

The Company’s investment objective is to generate current income and capital appreciation through the sourcing and origination of debt securities at all levels of the capital structure, including first and second lien debt, notes, bonds and mezzanine securities. The Company primarily targets loans to, and invests in, U.S. middle-market businesses. The Company’s portfolio at times may also include equity interests such as preferred stock, common stock, warrants or options received in connection with its debt investments. In certain cases, the Company may also invest directly in the equity of private companies and from time to time, may invest in other types of investments, which are not the primary focus of the Company, to enhance the overall return of the portfolio. These investments may include, but are not limited to, distressed debt and related opportunities. The Company believes that its investment strategy will allow the Company to generate cash available for distribution to its stockholders and to provide competitive total returns to its stockholders.

The Company’s business and affairs are managed under the direction of a board of directors (the “Board”). The Board consists of seven members, four of whom are not “interested persons” of the Company as defined in Section 2(a)(19) of the 1940 Act. The Board delegates daily management and investment authority to the Adviser pursuant to an investment management agreement (the “Investment Management Agreement”).

B. New Mountain Finance Advisers BDC, L.L.C.

The Adviser, a Delaware limited liability company that is registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the "Advisers Act"), serves as the investment adviser to the Company pursuant to an Investment Management Agreement. Subject to the overallsupervision of the Board, the Adviser manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory and management services to, the Company. Under the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the Adviser: (i) determines the composition of the portfolio of the Company, the nature and timing of the changes therein and the manner of implementing such changes; (ii) identifies, evaluates and negotiates the structure of the investments made by the Company; (iii) executes, monitors and services the Company’s investments; (iv) determines the securities and other assets that the Company will purchase, retain or sell; (v) performs due diligence on prospective portfolio companies; (vi) votes, exercises consents and exercises all other rights pertaining to such securities and other assets on behalf of the Company; and (vii) provides the Company with such other investment advisory, research and related services as the Company may, from time to time, reasonably require for the investment of its funds. The Adviser’s services under the Investment Management Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities, consistent with its fiduciary duties to the Company.

Pursuant to the terms of the Investment Management Agreement, the Company pays the Adviser a fee for investment advisory and management services consisting of a base management fee and a two-part incentive fee. The base management fee is calculated at an annual rate of 1.75% of the Company's gross assets less (i) the borrowings under the credit facility dated May 19, 2011 entered into by New Mountain Finance SPV Funding, L.L.C., a subsidiary of the Company, Wells Fargo Securities, L.L.C., and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and (ii) cash and cash equivalents (“Management Fee Assets”). The base management fee is payable quarterly in arrears and is calculated based on the average value of the Company’s Management Fee Assets at the end of each of the two most recently completed calendar quarters. The base management fee is appropriately adjusted on a pro rata basis for any equity capital raised or repurchased during the applicable calendar quarter or for any partial quarter.

The incentive fee has two components. One component is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Company’s pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter and is 20.0% of the amount, if any, by which the Company’s pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter exceeds a 2.0% (which is 8.0% annualized) hurdle rate, subject to a “catch-up” provision measured as of the end of each calendar quarter. Under this provision, in any calendar quarter, the Adviser receives no incentive fee until the Company’s adjusted net investment income equals the hurdle rate of 2.0%, but then receives, as a “catch-up,” 100% of the Company’s pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income with respect to that portion of such pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income, if any, that exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than 2.5% in any calendar quarter (10% annualized); this portion of the pre-incentive fee net adjusted investment income (which exceeds the hurdle rate but is less than or equal to 2.5%) is referred to herein as the “catch-up.” For this purpose, pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees (other than fees for providing managerial assistance), such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that it receives from portfolio companies) accrued by the Company during the calendar quarter, minus the Company’s operating expenses for the quarter (including the base management fee, expenses payable under the administration agreement, and any interest expense and any dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-incentive fee adjusted net investment income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with payment-in-kind interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that it has not yet received in cash.

The second component of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Management Agreement, as of the termination date), commencing on December 31, 2011, and equals 20.0% of the Company’s adjusted realized capital gains, if any, on a cumulative basis from inception through the end of each calendar year, computed net of all adjusted realized capital losses and adjusted unrealized capital depreciation through the end of such year, less all previous amounts paid in respect of the capital gain incentive fee provided that the incentive fee determined as of December 31, 2011 will be calculated for a period of shorter than twelve calendar months to take into account any adjusted realized capital gains computed net of all adjusted realized capital losses and adjusted unrealized capital depreciation from inception.

II. RELIEF FOR PROPOSED PAYMENT IN STOCK

A. Proposed Payment of Stock to the Adviser

The Company would like to pay 50% of the net after-tax incentive fee4 to the Adviser in the form of the Company’s common membership units, which are exchangeable into shares of NMF Corp’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, and the remainder of the incentive fee in cash (the “Plan”). Pursuant to the current Investment Management Agreement, the number of common membership units payable to the Adviser for its incentive fee would be calculated based on the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock on the last day of each calendar quarter in which the Adviser is entitled to receive an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee Date”), provided, that if the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock is less than the net asset value of such NMF Corp’s common stock with respect to any Incentive Fee Date, the incentive fee payable for that Incentive Fee Date will be paid in cash. However, NMF Corp. intends to seek shareholder approval to amend the Investment Management Agreement so that the number of common membership units payable to the Adviser for its incentive fee would be calculated based on the greater of (i) the net asset value, or (ii) the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock on any Incentive Fee Date. The Company believes that the proposed revised method of calculating the number of common membership units payable on any Incentive Fee Date is favorable to shareholders as it allows the Company to retain cash to pursue additional investment opportunities. In the event such shareholder approval is not received, the Adviser would continue to receive a cash payment for its incentive fee if the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock is less than the net asset value of such NMF Corp’s common stock with respect to any Incentive Fee Date. In either case, the Adviser would not have the ability to decline payment of the incentive fee in common membership units and demand payment in cash.

The common membership units issued to the Adviser as part of its incentive fee (referred to as the “Incentive Units”) will be subject to securities law and contractual restrictions on transfer. The Incentive Units (and any shares of NMF Corp common stock for which they are exchanged) will be issued in a private placement, and, as a result, will not be freely transferable under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). If the Applicants are granted the relief requested herein, NMF Corp will agree to register the resale of NMF Corp common stock by the Adviser or any of its employees. In addition, the Adviser will agree not to sell any common membership units or shares of NMF Corp common stock until the expiration of a lock-up period which expires one third on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the Incentive Fee Date.

The Applicants note that the Company does not have any procedures for the repurchase of Incentive Units or shares of NMF Corp’s common stock pursuant to the Plan, and there is no current contemplation of having such procedures in the future. As set forth in NMF Corp’s registration statement, NMF Corp has a dividend reinvestment plan that provides for reinvestment of its distribution on behalf of its stockholders unless a stockholder elects to receive cash.

In order for one common membership unit in the Company to remain the economic equivalent of one share of NMF Corp’s common stock, the limited liability company agreement of the Company requires that the number of common membership units of the Company held by NMF Corp must always equal the number of shares of NMF Corp’s common stock outstanding. Upon the Adviser’s exchange of incentive units for shares of NMF Corp’s common stock, NMF Corp will issue new common stock in an amount equal to the number of common membership units exchanged by the Adviser.

In the event that the Adviser is permitted to acquire Incentive Units, the Adviser will exchange them for shares of NMF Corp upon expiration of the lock-up period—allowing for one-third (1/3) of the Incentive Units paid to the Adviser to be exchanged annually for shares of NMF Corp on the Incentive Fee Date, with all such units paid in a particular quarter becoming exchangeable three years after the Incentive Fee Date. The lock-up period for any Incentive Units outstanding will immediately terminate upon termination of the Investment Management Agreement. Thus, as a practical matter, the Adviser will at all times hold common membership units of the Company as long as the Incentive Units are being paid to the Adviser and for at least three years after the last Incentive Fee Date, unless the Investment Management Agreement is terminated. No other equity-based compensation plan will exist for any personnel in their official capacities with the Company or of NMF Corp.

Upon conversion of the common membership units into shares of NMF Corp’s common stock, the Adviser will have demand rights and piggy back rights as detailed in the registration rights agreement, filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011 (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). Specifically, the Adviser has the right to require NMF Corp to file a registration statement for a public offering of all or part of the registrable securities held by the Adviser and NMF Corp must file the registration statement in respect of such demand registration within 45 days after receiving the demand request. In addition, the Adviser has the right to include any or all of its registrable securities in NMF Corp’s piggyback registration statement, subject to certain limitations contained in section 2.2.2 of the Registration Rights Agreement.

The Company will not obtain shareholder approval of the Plan.5 The Plan has been approved by the Board in connection with the approval of the Investment Management Agreement. The Board will not approve each issuance of Incentive Units. The Investment Management Agreement will be approved at least annually by the Board of the Company as required by section 15 of the 1940 Act. In addition, the Board will receive a report annually disclosing the actual incentive fees paid to the Adviser, including the extent to which those fees were paid in Incentive Units and all other material information pertinent to such issuance.

Section 23(a), made applicable to BDCs by Section 63, generally prohibits registered closed-end investment companies from issuing securities for services or for property other than cash or securities. The payment by the Company of a portion of the incentive fee due to the Adviser under the Investment Management Agreement in the form of the Incentive Units requires that the SEC grant relief from the restrictions imposed by Section 23(a) of the 1940 Act. The proposed use of Incentive Units is consistent with the purposes underlying section 23(a). The concerns underlying the enactment of this provision included (i) preferential treatment of investment company insiders and the use of options and other rights by insiders to obtain control of the investment company; (ii) complication of the investment company’s structure that made it difficult to determine the value of the company’s shares; and (iii) dilution of stockholders’ equity in the investment company.6

With respect to (i), the Plan will not entail any preferential treatment of investment company insiders or the use of options and other rights by insiders to obtain control of the investment company because the Incentive Units will be issued at the greater of (i) the net asset value, or (ii) the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock.7 This ensures that ultimately, there will be no dilution of the interests of non-insiders and ultimately that all stockholders will be treated the same from an economic perspective.

7 As set forth above, pursuant to the current Investment Management Agreement, the number of common membership units payable to the Adviser for its incentive fee would be calculated based on the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock on the last day of each calendar quarter in which the Adviser is entitled to receive an incentive fee (the “Incentive Fee Date”); provided, that if the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock is less than the net asset value of such NMF Corp’s common stock with respect to any Incentive Fee Date, the incentive fee payable for that Incentive Fee Date will be paid in cash. However, NMF Corp. intends to seek shareholder approval to amend the Investment Management Agreement so that the number of common membership units payable to the Adviser for its incentive fee would be calculated based on the greater of (i) the net asset value, or (ii) the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock on any Incentive Fee Date.

With respect to (iii), as set forth below, the Plan will not be dilutive to existing shareholders as of the Incentive Fee Date the Incentive Units will be issued at the greater of the net asset value or the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock. In the event that shareholder approval is not granted, the Incentive Units will be issued at the market price of NMF Corp’s common stock or paid in cash, neither of which would be dilutive to shareholders on the Incentive Fee Date.

Public companies regularly establish equity compensation plans that are designed to attract and retain key executives, employees and directors. Establishing equity compensation plans aligns the interests of stockholders with those of key executives, employees and directors, without resulting in excessive dilution for stockholders. Indeed, Section 61(a)(3)(B) specifically authorizes BDCs to adopt such plans, subject to certain specified conditions.

Pursuant to section 61(a)(3)(B)(iii), a BDC like NMF Corp could not issue equity compensation of the type described in section 61(a) to the extent that its investment adviser receives incentive compensation on capital gains under section 205(b)(3) of the Advisers Act. Specifically, section 61(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the 1940 Act states that “a BDC may issue, to its directors, officers, employees and general partners, warrants, options and rights to purchase voting securities of such company pursuant to an executive compensation plan, if…(iii) no investment adviser of such BDC receives any compensation described in Section 205(a)(1) of Title II of this Act, except to the extent permitted by paragraph (1)or (2) of Section 205(B).”

However, this prohibition does not apply with respect to any investment advisory contract between an investment adviser and a BDC, if (A) the compensation provided for in such contract does not exceed 20 per centum of the realized capital gains upon the funds of the BDC over a specified period or as of definite dates, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation, and the condition of section 61(a)(3)(B)(iii) of the 1940 Act is satisfied; and (B) the BDC does not have any outstanding option, warrant or right issued pursuant to section 61(a)(B)(3)(B) of the 1940 Act and does not have a profit-sharing plan described in section 57(n) of the 1940 Act.

Payment of a portion of the capital gains incentive fee in Incentive Units is fully consistent with the policy underlying the foregoing limitation. That limitation reflects a Congressional determination as to an appropriate limit on the level of compensation attributable to capital gains. That limitation will not be exceeded. First, the total capital gains incentive fee payable, whether paid in cash or with Incentive Units, is limited to 20% of realized capital gains. Second, the Incentive Units to be issued as payment are limited to 50% of the after-tax capital gains incentive fee amount. Given the importance of liquidity for the basic business operations of a BDC, this result is more favorable, and not less favorable, to the Company’s shareholders, than the result permissible under the literal application of section 61(a)(3)(B) of the 1940 Act and section 205(b)(3) of the Advisers Act.

The Staff, too, has recognized the importance of permitting investment companies to align the interests of management with those of its shareholders through the issuance of equity compensation. In Interpretive Matters Concerning Independent Directors of Investment Companies, Release No. IC-24083 (1999) (the “Release”), the Staff considered the question of compensating the directors of an open-end fund with shares of the open-end fund. In this context, Section 22(g) (which Section 23(a) mirrors) generally prohibits an open-end fund from issuing any of “its securities: (1) for services; or (2) for property other than cash or securities (including securities of which such registered company is the issuer), except as a dividend or distribution to its security holders or in connection with a reorganization.” The Staff reasoned that compensating open-end fund directors with equity would provide them with a tangible stake in the financial performance of the funds. This aligning of interests between directors and the funds’ stockholders also serves to protect the interests of stockholders.

The foregoing analysis is applicable in the context of a BDC that would like to use its equity securities to pay a portion of the incentive fee due to its adviser. In this particular case, the Company would like to pay a portion of the incentive fee in Incentive Units. The dollar value of the compensation that will be payable by the Company to the Adviser will be determinable and fixed based on the terms of the Investment Management Agreement. The number of Incentive Units that will be issuable to the Adviser in payment of this portion of the incentive fee will be calculated using the greater of (i) the net asset value, or (ii) the market price of the shares of common stock on the Incentive Fee Date. The Applicants believe that paying a portion of the advisory fee in Incentive Units is very beneficial to investors. Most importantly, it allows the Company to retain cash to be used to make additional investments. In addition to this benefit, the Plan will further align the interests of the Adviser and the Company, as payment of 50% of the incentive fee with Incentive Units increases the Adviser’s stake in the ongoing operations of the Company. Thus, as a stockholder, the operational success of the Company, beyond the ability to realize capital gains, would be important to the Adviser, as it would to any stockholder.

The proposed arrangement will result in no dilution for NMF Corp’s stockholders and align the interests of the Adviser with those of the stockholders. Incentive Units will be issued at the greater of (i) the net asset value, or (ii) the market price of the NMF Corp common stock, which means the issuance will not be dilutive. In addition, as a result of the lock-up, the Adviser will be incentivized to maximize the price of the common stock in the long term, in alignment with the interests of investors.

The Incentive Units will be issued to the Adviser in an exempt transaction, not subject to the registration requirements of the 1933 Act, and, therefore, will be “restricted securities.” As a result, the Incentive Units will be subject to restrictions on transfer. The Adviser also will be subject to contractual transfer restrictions. The issuance of the Incentive Units will not be on any preferential terms. The securities law restrictions and the contractual restrictions operate so as to ensure that the long-term performance of NMF Corp’s stock must be strong in order for the Incentive Units to have significant value. As a result, the Adviser will not reap the benefit of any “windfall” as a result of this arrangement. The payment of Incentive Units to the Adviser does not result in any additional benefits to the Adviser other than the basic benefits associated with stock ownership. The Adviser will, as a result of this arrangement, have an even more significant stake in the Company’s performance. In order for the Adviser to benefit from the receipt of the Incentive Units, the Company will have to grow and prosper.

The Applicants understand that currently there is no precedent for the payment of a portion of an Adviser’s compensation in securities of a BDC, like NMF Corp; however, the Applicants believe that permitting this arrangement would be consistent with the guidance given by the Staff permitting the use of fund shares to compensate directors. The Applicants also believe that the stockholders of NMF Corp will benefit from this arrangement. Moreover, the important role that equity compensation can play in attracting and retaining qualified personnel has been expressly recognized by the Commission with respect to certain types of investment companies, including closed-end investment companies and BDCs.

The Applicants would distinguish the relief sought here from that granted to MCG8 and Capital Southwest9. In those cases, relief was being sought with regard to employee compensation plans where the program that was the subject of relief was designed to align the interests of employees with those of the Company and its shareholders consistent with industry practice with regard to equity compensation. Here, in addition to aligning the interests of the Adviser with those of the Company, the Plan is designed solely to benefit the Company by permitting it to retain cash for investment and operational needs. Consistent with its purpose as an employee compensation tool, the restricted stock issued in the MCG and Capital Southwest applications entailed traditional vesting requirements and forfeiture restrictions. Unlike those applications, there is no vesting in the Company’s Plan, although, there are certain transfer restrictions consistent with the securities laws.

Pursuant to Rule 0-2(c) under the 1940 Act, the Applicants hereby state that each of the Applicants, by resolution duly adopted by the Board of each of New Mountain Finance Corporation and New Mountain Finance Holdings, L.L.C. and the Managing Member of New Mountain Finance Advisers BDC, L.L.C. on July 19, 2010, September 16, 2010 and July 21, 2011, respectively (attached hereto as Exhibit A), has authorized to cause to be prepared and to execute and file with the Commission this Application and any amendment thereto under Section 6(c) of the 1940 Act, for an order granting an exemption from Sections 63 and 23(a) of the 1940 Act. Each person executing the application on behalf of the Applicants says that he has duly executed the Application for and on behalf of the Applicants; that he is authorized to execute the Application pursuant to the terms of an operating agreement, management agreement or otherwise; and that all actions by members, directors or other bodies necessary to authorize each such deponent to execute and file the Application have been taken.

The undersigned states that he has duly executed the foregoing Application, dated January 19, 2012, for and on behalf of each Applicant, as the case may be, that he holds the office with such entity as indicated below and that all action by the directors, stockholders, general partners, trustees or members of each entity, as applicable, necessary to authorize the undersigned to execute and file such instrument has been taken. The undersigned further states that he is familiar with such instrument and the contents thereof and that the facts set forth therein are true to the best of his knowledge, information and belief.

RESOLVED, that the Company is authorized to file with the Commission any such reports, information and documents (including, without limitation, any amendment, supplement or exhibit thereto) as may be necessary or advisable under (i) the Securities Act, (ii) the Exchange Act and (iii) the 1940 Act (as applicable), and that each Authorized Officer is authorized to prepare or cause to be prepared, and to execute, in the name and on behalf of the Company, and file or cause to be filed with the Commission, such reports, information and documents (including, without limitation, any amendment, supplement or exhibit thereto), in such form and with such changes, additions and modifications thereto as any Authorized Officer may approve, and to execute such other instruments, make all such other payments and do or cause to be done all such other acts and things, as in the opinion of such officer, may be necessary or advisable in order to effectuate this resolution and carry out the purposes hereof.

RESOLVED, that each of Robert Hamwee, Adam Weinstein and Paula Bosco (each, an “Authorized Officer”) be, and each hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to cause to be prepared, executed, delivered and filed with the Commission any application or applications, including any subsequent amendments, modifications or additions hereto (each an “Application”), for exemptive orders pursuant to the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act, and the respective rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, as such Authorized Officer, in their sole discretion, deems necessary or appropriate; and FURTHER RESOLVED, that each of the Authorized Officers be, and each hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, in the name and on behalf of the Company, to do such other acts or things and execute such other documents as they deem necessary or desirable to cause each Application to comply with the 1940 Act and the Exchange Act and the respective rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, in such form and accompanied by such exhibits and other documents, as the Authorized Officer or Officers preparing the same shall approve, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of an Application.

	NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. By: /s/ Adam Weinstein
		Name: Adam Weinstein Title: Chief Financial Officer

	NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE CORPORATION By: /s/ Adam Weinstein
		Name: Adam Weinstein Title: Chief Financial Officer

	NEW MOUNTAIN FINANCE ADVISERS BDC, L.L.C. By: /s/ Adam Weinstein
		Name: Adam Weinstein Title: Authorized Officer